Play two short clips that illustrate different levels on one criterion, ask observers to score independently, then force consensus through evidence citing: which words, moves, or moments justify the rating? Capture the language used. Repeat for one more criterion. The rhythm is fast, energizing, and enough to align a busy team.
Exemplars shrink guesswork. Record a strong performance and annotate where each criterion appears. Pair it with a near‑miss clip to spark contrastive learning. When learners see and hear the difference, micro‑behaviors become actionable, repeatable moves rather than abstract ideals that sound inspiring but crumble under pressure during timed role‑play rounds.
Start with self‑ratings and one observed strength, then request peers to affirm or refine with specific evidence. Delay corrective input momentarily to let ownership form. When gaps appear, invite the performer to propose their next experiment. This structure maintains dignity, keeps agency high, and still lands precise, challenging feedback supported by shared criteria.
All Rights Reserved.